Controversy Surrounding the Canonization of Junipero Serra: A Closer Look at the Actions of the 18th-century Franciscan Friar
The upcoming canonization of Junipero Serra by Pope Francis has sparked controversy and debate among Native Americans and conscientious objectors. Serra, an 18th-century Franciscan Friar who founded several Spanish Catholic missions in California, is being criticized for his documented history of extreme abuse and mistreatment of indigenous peoples.
According to author Elias Castillo, Serra was known for brutally beating and whipping men, women, and children in order to force obedience among the indigenous population. He also celebrated the deaths of Indian children, referring to their passing as a “harvest.” Additionally, Serra is accused of kidnapping indigenous people who did not voluntarily enter his missions and subjecting them to harsh conditions that led to the deaths of thousands.
Despite these troubling actions, Serra is set to be canonized by Pope Francis during his visit to the United States. This decision has sparked outrage among Native Americans and advocates for indigenous rights, who argue that Serra’s actions should not be glorified or celebrated.
Steven Newcomb, co-founder of the Indigenous Law Institute, highlights the broader issue of the Christian system of domination that justified the mistreatment and enslavement of indigenous peoples. He argues that the focus should not just be on Serra as an individual, but on the larger system that allowed for such atrocities to occur.
While there is no indication that Pope Francis will reconsider the canonization of Serra, Native Americans and conscientious objectors are calling for the repeal of papal edicts that justified the theft of Native American lands and the persecution of indigenous peoples. They are also advocating for the repeal of Columbus Day as a federal holiday, citing the need to stop celebrating individuals who were responsible for violence and oppression.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Junipero Serra’s canonization highlights the need to reexamine the actions of historical figures and the systems that allowed for their behavior. It is a call to open our eyes to the true history of religious extremism and its impact on indigenous communities.