The Risks of Hasty Canonizations: Lessons from the McCarrick Scandal

The recent Vatican report on the scandal surrounding ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick has reignited the debate on the quick canonization of popes and other individuals. The report revealed that Pope John Paul II received warnings about McCarrick but still allowed him to rise in the ranks of the church.

This raises questions about the rush to canonize individuals without a thorough examination of their lives. The case of Eva Peron, whose canonization was delayed due to a mandatory waiting period, serves as a cautionary tale. Peron’s reputation has been tarnished in recent years, highlighting the importance of taking time to assess a person’s legacy.

The practice of fast-tracking canonizations, especially of popes, is not without controversy. Critics argue that it is more about ecclesial politics than sanctity, with supporters pushing for sainthood to reinforce their chosen leader’s legacy. This can make it difficult to question and reverse a pope’s policies once they are canonized.

The joint canonization of Pope John XXIII and John Paul II was seen as a way to bridge the gap between liberal and conservative factions in the church. However, the rush to canonize individuals without proper scrutiny can have unintended consequences, as seen in the case of McCarrick.

Instead of focusing on popes, some suggest canonizing lay people, such as the Rwandan students who were killed for their refusal to separate into ethnic groups. Their witness against genocide and for solidarity could serve as a powerful example for young people.

In the wake of scandals like McCarrick’s, it is important to reexamine the process of canonization and ensure that it truly reflects the values of the Catholic Church. Rushing to declare someone a saint without a thorough evaluation can undermine the credibility of the church and its teachings.